🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."